来源 The Cold Hard Truth About Economic Recovery

[ 2009-10-15 6:02:28 | Author: jonson | View:1216 | Comment:2 | Weather: sunny | Mood: normal ]
Font Size: Large | Medium | Small
The pundits on CNBC and the nightly news are dead wrong about the economic recovery. And as Wall Street’s pros praise the economic strides they’re seeing, the market’s real fundamentals keep getting worse, while more and more regular investors are falling into the trap.

Here’s why the only way to make money in this market is to turn conventional investing strategy on its head…

As cool weather descends upon the Northeast U.S., risk appetites start to wane. Last week, traders and investors finally sobered up. Are they second-guessing whether government spending can actually kick-start a sustainable recovery? Both top stocks for 2010 and corporate bonds sold off sharply.


The big questions of the moment: What kind of economic environment do we face? And more important, what’s already priced into the stock market? Here’s my view on these themes: As we see with “cash for clunkers,” government stimuli simply steal demand from the future.

But more importantly — because this is not yet a mainstream view — the real job creators in the U.S. economy, small businesses, will not expand hiring as expected. There are many reasons for subdued hiring plans; an emerging reason to avoid expansion and hiring will be heightened expectations that tax rates will soar in the future to pay for out-of-control government spending.

So I expect over the next several months, mainstream pundits and forecasters will start worrying about tepid hiring, even as the pace of job losses slows. As we “lap” the 2009 corporate cost cutting by early 2010, and top lines fail to rebound, earnings estimates will have to come back down. I’m amazed at how many sell-side analysts are modeling V-shaped recoveries in 2010 earnings. Most stock prices are disconnected from reality.

Another big question is how will policymakers respond to a sluggish-to-nonexistent rebound in hiring? The economically illiterate, and those with preconceived “big government” agendas, will use any crisis as an excuse to expand government. You’ll be ahead of the game if you realize — as many in the media and academia clearly do not — that the government has no resources. It’ll take money out of one of your pockets, skim some off for its cronies, and expect you to be grateful when they put some of it — debased by the Fed’s inflation, of course — back into your other pocket.

The labor market is dealing with a structural imbalance fueled by government-sponsored housing and credit bubbles. Many will call for the government to “solve” this labor market problem, which will cause a new type of market dislocation. By early 2010, some will push for the federal government to start hiring the chronically unemployed in “New Deal” type of programs.

Where you stand on this question will determine your expectations for the future performance of most top stocks to buy (ignoring special situations). I certainly don’t enjoy having such a bearish outlook on the economy, but it’s the conclusion I reach after weighing all the evidence about the real economy; the credit markets; and policymakers’ damaging, distorting influence.

Some pundits point to corporate mergers and acquisitions as reasons to be bullish, ignoring that fact that most deals occur closer to the peak of markets, and most deals destroy shareholder value, because the buyer overpays. The 2000 AOL-Time Warner merger is a case in point.

Recently announced deals in pursuit of tech service companies are not a sign of strength; they’re defensive moves to counteract declining hardware sales and profit margins. Cisco is constantly adding to its extensive list of acquired technology companies partly to divert the Street’s attention away from the poor growth prospects and rising competition in its core businesses. Dell’s and Xerox’s recently announced acquisitions are defensive because the computer hardware business stinks.

Corporate CFOs and Treasurers are happy about the recent bull market in risk. They know much more about their prospects than outside investors, so their balance sheet management is telling. In a word, the approach toward capital structure is “defensive.”

Heavily indebted companies are flooding the market with follow-on stock offerings to pay down debts. They’re also taking advantage of the Pollyannaish mood of the corporate bond market to issue risky bonds at attractive rates, as default risk seems to be a distant memory of bond buyers. Many corporate bond investors have taken the Fed’s bait to reach for yield, regardless of credit risk.

This isn’t the “buyer’s market” that most of Wall Street would have you believe we’re in.

That doesn’t mean that there isn’t a colossal amount of money to be had in best stocks to buy right now — if you’re betting against them. That’s exactly what I’m advising my Strategic Short Report readers to do on a daily basis.

It’s time to turn around your investment analysis and look for companies that are poised to crash, not the ones that could rally in the coming months. Once investor sentiment turns back around, you wont want to be on the long side of most top stocks for 2010.

 
 
Quotekaylanto
[ 2009-10-26 9:51:35]
seeding  treaty  end  technology  solar  taken
 
Quoterosfoote
[ 2009-10-26 9:50:13]
action  users  extreme  policymakers  allows  weather

The articles ban comments。